← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[ubl-ndrsc] Fragment processing with local elements
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
ubl-ndrsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Fragment processing with local elements
From: "Eve L. Maler" <>
To: "UBL-NDRSC (E-mail)" <>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:43:43 -0500
Per my action item, I have asked some colleagues about difficulties in
fragment processing. If I get any additional input I'll forward it along.
Eve
From: Norman Walsh <>
/ "Eve L. Maler" <> was heard to say:
| Commerce One, having done some experiments around this, expressed the
| concern that if you break up your XML document into fragments and try
| to process those fragments independently, local elements at the
| "roots" of these fragments need to have their type specified with
| xsi:type in order to be schema-processable.
Yep. And if you don't have globally declared types for them, I don't
know what you do.
| That seems like a
| reasonable situation to me; a local element is only known within the
| scope of its parent so you have to provide more context. But are
| there other gotchas? Should fragment processing be done in some other
| way for better efficiency (i.e., why is the literal XML document being
| broken up into literal fragments on disk rather than a parse tree
| being manipulated)?
Short of passing around validated infosets (and can you really say
it's still valid if you rip a hunk out of the middle and pass it to
someone else?), I don't think passing trees around is much different
than passing serialized characters around.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
| The public! The public! How many fools does
XML Standards Architect | it take to make up a public?--Chamfort
Web Tech. and Standards |
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →