RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Digital Signatures

Paul wrote:

> Please look at the XML Signature standard, and you will notice that it
> uses X.509v3.  I am just pointing out that you can avoid the added
> overhead of XML Signitures by using X.509 directly.n
> 

But if we decide that we absolutely must have DSig in the payload, then I would lean towards using the W3C spec as consistent with best practice and our guiding principles.

Mark