It was actually clear the first time ;)
I believe the answer is "no".
<UBLContainer> is a shortcut, not a real name. You won't have
successsive containers of the same name or type, so it wouldn't
qualify, would it?
Chin Chee-Kai wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Chin Chee-Kai wrote:
>
>
>>>Question:
>>>
>>>When 2 or more containers end up sitting consecutively in
>>>a complexType, should there be a container applied onto the
>>>list of containers themselves?
>>>
>>>Ie. in the situation as follows:
>>>
>>> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeA>...</SomeTypeA></UBLContainer>
>>> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeB>...</SomeTypeB></UBLContainer>
>>> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeC>...</SomeTypeC></UBLContainer>
>>>
>>>should the list of <UBLContainer>s be recursively contained
>>>as in:
>>>
>>><UBLContainer>...</UBLContainer>
>>> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeA>...</SomeTypeA></UBLContainer>
>>> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeB>...</SomeTypeB></UBLContainer>
>>> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeC>...</SomeTypeC></UBLContainer>
>>><UBLContainer>...</UBLContainer>
>>>
>>>?
>
>
> Sorry, for the last example, I meant it to show:
>
> <UBLContainer>
> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeA>...</SomeTypeA></UBLContainer>
> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeB>...</SomeTypeB></UBLContainer>
> <UBLContainer><SomeTypeC>...</SomeTypeC></UBLContainer>
> </UBLContainer>
>
> and ask whether this is the way Containers should be applied
> or otherwise. Hope it wasn't confusing. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Chin Chee-Kai
> SoftML
> Tel: +65-6820-2979
> Fax: +65-6743-7875
> Email:
> http://SoftML.Net/
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
>
--
Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail:
Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442
Sun Microsystems Inc. | 1800 Harrison St. Oakland, CA 94612
W3C AC Rep / OASIS TAB Chair
