Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: Schema generation

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Dan Vint wrote:

>>Sorry this didn't get in the minutes/notes but it was disscussed on a call.
>>The Regex that was published was:
>>
>>         [a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9]*
>>
>>the problem is the first '+' it should not be there as all you want to
>>specify is the first character like this:
>>
>>         [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*
>>
>>..dan

Thank you, Dan, and you're right about the extra "+".
This makes the regex more compact.

Can I presume that since this modification was supposed to
be minuted but didn't, that this latter regex is accepted
as Rule 5?

Thanks.



Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: 
http://SoftML.Net/