Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 94 Nil - Duplicate

From
Chin Chee-Kai <>
Date
2003-07-15T14:56:26+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 94 Nil - Duplicate
Amendment Required because prohibiting xsd:nil does NOT
equate with prohibiting empty content element.

Suggested change:

[R 94]: The nillable attribute MUST NOT be used.
        Empty content element MUST NOT be instantiated
        UNLESS it is expressly a user-intended indication
        to instantiate empty content for a given element.


Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: 
http://SoftML.Net/


On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:

>>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>>
>>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>>
>>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
>>
>>*******************************
>>[R 94]  The nillable attribute MUST NOT be used
>>
>>Note:  Duplicate.  See Rule 32.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---
>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003