At 10:27 AM 7/15/2003 -0500, Burcham, Bill wrote:
>I think we should remove this rule. A user can filter out annotations if
>they are unwanted.
Ok then the implication of this is that the only schema that UBL sends is
one with full documentation/annotation. I suppose I can live with that, but
again I would state this as a rule that the schemas are fully documented.
..dan
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chin Chee-Kai [mailto:]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:52 AM
>To: UBL-NDR
>Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema
>
>
>Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are
> otherwise the same except for documentation
> is a user-level optimisation/preference issue
> that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR.
>
>This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative add-on, or
>reading aid or optimized version (assuming
>documented version is normative).
>
>Suggest removing it.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>Chin Chee-Kai
>SoftML
>Tel: +65-6820-2979
>Fax: +65-6743-7875
>Email:
>http://SoftML.Net/
>
>
>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>
> >>Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will
> >>try to mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might
> >>duplicate it. The membership has 5 working days to bring forth
> >>objection or discussion, after the 5 working days, if there are no
> >>objections, the rule will be assumed to be "ACCEPTED" and be given to
> >>the LCSC for their implementation.
> >>
> >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
> >>
> >>Voting period on this rule ends: July 22, 2003
> >>
> >>*******************************
> >>[R 96] Two schemas shall be developed for each standard. One schema
> >>shall be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall
> >>be a fully annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations.
> >>
> >>
> >>ATG Decision: ACCEPTED.
> >>
> >>
> >>---
> >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
> >>
>
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
