> [R 85] Schemas should be designed (or generated) such that instances
> conforming to them are readable and understandable, and should enable
> reasonably intuitive interactions.
Better, but I'm still wondering if the judgment of such things is too subjective for a rule ...
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Vint [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, 14 July 2003 16:18
To: UBL-NDR
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 85
I don't think the Instance has anything to do with the readability and
understandability. Seems to me this should be a requirement for the schema
design/generation process. This seems more appropriate:
[R 85] Schemas should be designed (or generated) such that instances
conforming to them are readable and understandable, and should enable
reasonably intuitive interactions.
At 10:17 AM 7/14/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it. The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends: July 18, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 85] Instances conforming to schemas should be readable and
>understandable, and should enable reasonably intuitive interactions.
>
>
>ATG Decision: rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2
>
>
>
>---
>
>File has not been scanned
>
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
