Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 110 Complex Type Extension

Is extension also restriction? Also is this for UBL base schemas or really 
meant for end user customization? I would think we would probably have 2 
different types in the UBL schemas, and this is only a customization issue.

..dan


At 10:21 AM 7/16/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 23, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 110]  (not finalized) Complex Type extension SHOULD be used where
>appropriate.
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>