Remember, we already *greed our normative form is XSD, and all of our rules would be focused accordingly.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177 Fax (703) 917-7481
Wireless (703) 655-4810
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"
-----Original Message-----
From: Eve L. Maler <>
To: Dan Vint <>
CC: Lisa-Aeon <>; UBL-NDR <>
Sent: Wed Jul 16 15:14:20 2003
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 114 Notations
Dan Vint wrote:
> Is there also a need for a statement about the use of DTD declarations
> in our schemas for things like entities?
Sigh, it would be most complete to do so -- as XML documents, schema
modules could theoretically contain internal/external subsets.
> I'm assuming this rule is here because it really requires the use of the
> DTD to declare the NOTATION in the first place.
The schema "notation" feature is supposedly not even compatible with the
DTD <!NOTATION...> feature, so it's best to stay away from it for lots
of reasons.
Eve
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
