At 11:48 PM 7/2/2003 +0100, Anthony B. Coates wrote:
>** Reply to message from Dan Vint <> on Wed, 02 Jul 2003
>15:38:23 -0700
>
> > Where I have problems with one namespace is for my usage - where I might
> > only want to bring in the UBL code lists or UBL basic data types (those
> > re-usable pieces) because I would want to use them in my own schemas for a
> > vertical industry that doesn't do much with PO's and order management. I
> > would also like to get to some of the common things like address and party
> > without having the whole UBL universe imported into my environment. I want
> > selective reuse and I don't know how to do that when there is one
> namespace
> > and one file.
>
>At that level, I don't think there is a simple solution. What have done in
>practice is to use an XSLT stylesheet or two to extract just the item I want,
>plus all of the things it depends on, from the Schema. I can also think
>of one
>commercial tool that might be able to do it. I think it is beyond our
>capabilities to organise the Schemas to make this easy, though (it would lead
>to too many Schema files, too many includes).
I would think that we should at least get into separate files/namespaces
the things that are shared across the different documents - for instance
the data types, and common elements. I would hope that we are also
following our own proposal for any UBL code lists and formatting them so
that people can reuse them as well.
..dan
> Cheers,
> Tony.
>====
>Anthony B. Coates
>London Market Systems Limited
>33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR
>http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/
>mailto:
>Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026
>[MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/]
>[FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language),
>http://www.fpml.org/]
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material
>and is intended for the use of the addressee only.
>Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake
>please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your
>e-mail software.
>Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems
>Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of
>this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus
>infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no
>responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please
>request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions
>presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of
>London Market Systems Limited.
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php