I would change the rule text:
>[R 82] UBL documents must conform to all the requirements of the most
>current XML Recommendation.
Why are we worried just about these characters. I don't know that this is
even required, but if you want to keep something for this rule, then I
would make the more general and inclusive rule as above. Otherwise its
like, "Oh all I need are these characters I can forget about all the other
XML requirements".
At 10:17 AM 7/14/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it. The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends: July 18, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 82] UBL documents must use the same legal characters in XML character
>data that are listed in the XML Recommendation. Including tab, carriage
>return, line feed, and the legal characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646.
>
>
>ATG Decision: rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2
>
>
>
>---
>
>File has not been scanned
>
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
