Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo

From
Chee-Kai Chin
Date
2003-08-27T11:11:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo




From: Chin Chee-Kai <>
To: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:10:52 +0800 (SGT)






On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:

>>We are under no obligation to use a particular feature of XSD, 
>>only to use XSD.  We have made many decisions regarding the
>>appropriateness of using certain features - that is what NDR is
>>all about.  

Many of those decisions were also reviewed, re-decided,
deprecated and expanded.  I'm not sure sometimes certain
decisions made are the most corret, but we go along anyway.
But some are just plain irky -- that's what the debate is all about.

Why <documentation> then?



>>Exactly.  And we, as NDR determined that the right thing 
>>was to avoid the use of AppInfo to ensure broadest market 
>>appeal.  I have a business case that says that we will 
>>loose part of our audience if we include normative AppInfo 
>>in our schema. 

I'm sure it has been appropriately assessed then that 
that single business case represents more than 80% of 
the world's estimated market for business....


Thanks.



Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: 
http://SoftML.Net/
Next in thread → Next in month →