The CCTS specifies primary and secondary representation terms. Both are lexically synonimous to "representation term". There is no such thing as "qualifier representation term". If LC has that in the spreadsheet, then they need to clarify and ensure conformance with CCTS.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chin Chee-Kai [mailto:]
Sent: Thu 9/18/2003 10:14 PM
To: UBL NDRSC
Cc:
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] NDR Checklist Clarification
R13:
----------
For every primary representation term used in the UBL model, a named
complex type MUST be defined.
----------
R14:
----------
For every secondary representation term used in the UBL model, a named
complex type MUST be defined.
----------
How do "primary representation term" and "secondary representation
term" relate to each other, and to "representation term" and
"qualifier representation term"? Are they 4 different concepts,
or some are synonyms or something else?
In the spreadsheet models, there are only "qualifier representation
term" and "representation term". Please clarify.
R90:
-----------
A RootSchema in one UBL namespace that is dependant upon type definitions
or element declarations defined in another namespace MUST NOT import
schema modules from that namespace.
-----------
What is this talking about??
Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email:
http://SoftML.Net/
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php.
