RE: [ubl-ndrsc] NDR Checklist Clarification

Sorry for the very late response.  In my travels and recovery period I missed this entirely.

Tim wrote - 
> my interpretation of [D6] is:
> 
> data type =  qualifier + (primary or secondary representation term )
> NOT
> data type =  (primary qualifier + primary) or  (secondary qualifier 
> +secondary representation term )
> 
> either way, as far as UBL is concerned in all known cases, 
> qualifier is 
> null, therefore data type is either a primary or secondary 
> representation term.  my question to mark is can we therefore 
> drop the 
> qualifer altogether and make this rule fixed.
> 
> it is up to the CCTS people to say if this is complaint or not.
I would concur.

Mark