Dear Ken,
Thank you for this, unfortunately I think maybe my first message was a bit unclear and I apologise. The actual terms used in the recommendation are:
medium-sized enterprises,
small enterprises
microenterprises
There is only a hyphen for medium and no "sized" for small and micro. Small enterprises is two words and microenterprises are one word.
Can we align further?
And yes I agree the terminology is not very standard, but what can I do?
Sorry for procrastinating on this one, but I was feeling a bit guilty for not being more precise in the first place.
Kind regards,
Natalie
-----Original Message-----
From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 5:21 PM
To: MURIC Natalie (OP); ; ; ;
Subject: RE: [ubl-pre-award] Re: Tickets to be included into PRD01 (addressed in the excel files)
I've updated the configuration files accordingly, Natalie, thank you.
<abbreviation short="SME">Micro-, Small-, and
Medium-sized Enterprise</abbreviation>
. . . . . Ken
At 2019-05-27 11:06 +0000, wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>The
><https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32003H0361>EU
>Recommendation 2003/361 defines SME as: micro,
>small and medium-sized enterprises.
>
>The eProcurement ontology also uses this
>definition. Would it be possible to align UBL?
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Natalie
>
>Natalie Muric
>
>Publications Office of the European Union
>Directorate C – Access to and reuse of public information
>C.3 – TED and EU public procurement
>2, rue Mercier • L-2985 Luxembourg
>Tel. +352 292944008 • Fax +352 292944604
><mailto:>
>https://publications.europa.eu
>
><https://www.facebook.com/EULawandPublications>Facebook
>- <https://twitter.com/EUPublications>@EU
>Publications - <http://twitter.com/EURLex>@EUR-Lex
><http://twitter.com/CORDIS_EU>@CORDIS_EU -
><http://twitter.com/EUTenders>@EUTenders
><http://twitter.com/EULawDataPubs>@EULawDataPubs
>- <http://twitter.com/EU_opendata>@EU_opendata
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><> On Behalf Of G. Ken Holman
>Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 4:15 AM
>To: cécile GUASCH
><>; Kenneth
>Bengtsson <>;
>Subject: [ubl-pre-award] Re: Tickets to be
>included into PRD01 (addressed in the excel files)
>
>Please forgive me for overlooking this email
>while I was at a conference last week.
>
>Tonight I created the schemas for the worksheets
>you cited, but I had to make four changes:
>
>- "Tendering Criterion Property. Value Data Type
>Code. Code" was labeled 2.3 but actually was introduced into UBL in 2.2
>- "Tendering Criterion. Tendering Criterion
>Property Group" was labeled 2.3 but actually was introduced into UBL in 2.2
>- "SME" was not in the list of approved
>abbreviations, so I have added it with the
>expansion being "Small- and Medium-sized Enterprise"
>- the ampersand character "&" was used in a
>definition and it is prohibited, so I replaced it with the word "and"
>
>With those changes, I was able to successfully produce some schemas:
>
><https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=65354>https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=65354
>
>I hope these are helpful.
>
>. . . . . . Ken
>
>At 2019-05-15 18:12 +0200, cécile GUASCH wrote:
> >Dear Ken, Kenneth
> >
> >Please find here the list of tickets that have been addressed:
> >
> >UBL-127
> >UBL-134
> >UBL-159
> >UBL-184
> >UBL-185
> >UBL-186
> >UBL-187
> >UBL-188
> >UBL-199
> >UBL-200
> >UBL-208
> >UBL-214
> >UBL-216
> >UBL-229
> >in the two pre-award excel files:-Pre award worksheet UBL 2.3 Document
> >Elements spreadsheet - Pre-award worksheet
> ><https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PnKU0-segZ9FmfcNdoavN1OKM80sij
> >bJU90y__g0Ba4/edit#gid=1299030027><https://docs
> .google.com/spreadsheets/>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/
> >d/1PnKU0-segZ9FmfcNdoavN1OKM80sijbJU90y__g0Ba4/edit#gid=1299030027Â
> >
> >and UBL 2.3 Library Elements Spreadsheet - Pre-award worksheet
> ><https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Kg1hE8gl520Dqd1LuHg0CnC-CuNTR-
> >d2yHCqnHj9V1Y/edit#gid=1482665391><https://docs
> .google.com/spreadsheets/>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/
> >d/1Kg1hE8gl520Dqd1LuHg0CnC-CuNTR-d2yHCqnHj9V1Y/edit#gid=1482665391Â
> >
> >
> >UBL-211 (no change to the excel files but have a known error in the
> >documentation) The description of the PRD01:
> >"Â The UBL 2.3 version includes:Â
> >Â
> > * Support further improvement of the
> >QualificationApplicationRequest and QualificationApplicationResponse
> >making them fitter for purpose:
> >Â
> > * allowing to specify criteria per lot(s)/commodityClassification
> >and evidences per lot/commodityClassification,
> > * enriching the TenderingCriterionProperty ABIE with new elements
> >of type URl, indicator, maximum quantity and minimum quantity
> > * loosening the
> > TenderingCriterionPropertyGroup cardinality to allow for the specific
> >case when a criterion is composed of subcriteria but has no specific
> >TenderingCriterionProperty.
> > * Support of CPB identification with adding the element
> >ContractingParty.ContractingRepresentationType.Â
> > * Alignment of all notices to convey NoticeType Code and Requested
> >Publication DateÂ
> > * Support of Additional Information Request deadline
> > * Better support of contract modification
> > * More information on ProcurementProject, Tendering Terms and
> >Tendering Process"
> >Please let me know if the information provided in sufficient.
> >
> >KRs,Â
> >Cécile
--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |
