PaymentMeans in the Swedish subset

Hi, and thanks for a 
very interesting meeting in Brussels! 
 
We had a discussion 
regarding the cardinality for payment means. In the Swedish subset (UBL 1.0) we 
had to extend the cardinality to 0..n because it's very common to state at least 
two means of payment in a Swedish invoice. 
 
I have attached an 
invoice-picture (in Swedish unfortunately) the payment means are marked in red. 
This is a very common scenario in Sweden (and Norway I think).
 
I 
was told that PaymentMeans has also been added to PaymentTerms, and PaymentTerms 
has cardinality 0..n, but is this really the way to go here? 
 
If we 
would use the PaymentTerms to allow more than one PaymentMeans, the Swedish 
subset won’t be interoperable with the Danish subset.
 
Best 
regards,

Martin Forsberg

SFTI 
Tekniska kansli



 

More info regarding 
the Swedish subset:

http://www.amnis.se/svefaktura/SFTI_Basic_Invoice20041108_EN/index.html (temporary 
website)

invoice.PNG