MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests
From: Anne Hendry <>
To: Lisa-Aeon <>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:22:07 -0800
Hi Lisa,
From my understanding,yes, there is supposed to be a codelist schema
module (or modules, I imagine) as the drawing shows, which would contain
the code list schemas themselves, similar layout to what we had in Beta
in that they are separate from the other schemas, is probably the main
idea being depicted there. Then there would be a separate module for
the code list unspecified dts, since they need to be included in the cl
schema module, but the cl schema module needs to be included in the
other (non-cl) dt module, so the cl unspecialised dts need to be
separate to avoid the circular inclusion. I'd assume they would
continue to reside where all those other schemas reside, in the 'common'
directory (common/codelist in beta) unless the packaging team has
changed that layout.
I've been told there was an in-depth discussion of the code list schema
implementation at last week's lcsc meeting. I didn't attend, so perhaps
someone from that meeting can answer your other questions (and provide
any updates to my response as well since I wasn't here for last week's
discussions).
-Anne
Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Marty Burns and I are reviewing the draft 7.1 codelist right now also. We
>are alittle confused, we are using Marks Visio drawing from the face to face
>and there seems to be missing pieces of the codelist stuff. Is there
>supposed to be a Codelist Schema Modules? not just Unqualified Codelist
>module. Where will it reside, and what will be in it?
>
>Also, in the Common Basic Components, and in the CCT there are types that
>have attributes that are code list values, but they are not inheriting from
>codelists. For example - Amount.Type.
>
>We need some answers on how this is all supposed to work......neither Marty
>or I were in the meeting where this was discussed at the F2F. We are trying
>to see how the CCT and CCP are working within the Codelist modules, and we
>are not seeing it. For example: Codetype contains a listID that is not the
>CCP listID.
>
>Not having these answers is slowing down the review of this work. Can
>someone please get back to us.
>
>Lisa and Marty.
>
>
>
>
>
