Important Codelist Schema Generation Matter for the Wednesday Co-ordination Call

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Important Codelist Schema Generation Matter for the Wednesday Co-ordination Call




From: "Stephen Green" <>
To: "David Kruppke" <>,<>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:52:05 -0000










Here is a matter LCSC would like to 
discuss on the Co-ordination call (or through e-mail 
from any who can't attend). It is important 
for the generation of our Schemas.
 
We in LCSC have two or three possible ways we 
can think of to architect the Schemas 
with regard to codelists:-
 
a) We would like to offer two alternative 
solutions, both of which involve the removal
of the CLUDT Schema module, the moving of the 
CodeType into the UDT Schema Module
and the references to cludt:xxxCodeType 
in other modules changed from cludt to udt. 
The CodeTypes in the codelist Schemas would 
then be based on the CCT rather than the
CLUDT.
 
One of the alternatives incorporating the above 
is:-
 
b) To keep the 'codelist/use' folder and its 
various Codelist Schema Modules but to
remove all enumerations from the SDT Schema Module 
out of the Codelist Schema Modules 
and into the SDT Schema Module.
 
The other is:-
 
c) To remove the codelist/use folder and its 
various Codelist Schema Modules and to 
enumerate all the specialised (SDT) codes into the 
SDT Schema Module.
 
 
 
 
b) seems to present a better solution for 
customisation but c) is simpler
(LCSC has some members prefering either 
option)
 
If a) is ruled out it still leaves b) and c), 
albeit changed a little, as alternative designs.
 
 
 
I have attached sets of Schemas following each approach b) and c).
The main differences are in the existence or non-existence of Codelist 
Schemas in a 
'codelist/use' folder. They also have enumerations in either place but not 
in both.
 
Please would people examine these in order to express a preference or 
important
issues regarding each alternative before or during the Co-ordination Call 
tomorrow.
We really do need to have a decision tomorrow.
 
Many Thanks
 
Steve
 
 
xsd-SDG-codelist-modules.zip
xsd-SDG-sdt-codelists.zip





Follow-Ups:

Re: [ubl] Important Codelist Schema Generation Matter for theWednesday Co-ordination Call
From: Bill Meadows <>
AW: [ubl] Important Codelist Schema Generation Matter for the Wednesday Co-ordination Call
From: "David Kruppke" <>
Re: [ubl] Important Codelist Schema Generation Matter for the Wednesday Co-ordination Call
From: 








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]