[:]
| >Most importantly, this plan has not yet been presented to
| > the OAG membership, so we cannot be sure that changes we
| > implement in UBL 1.0 will match changes implemented in OAGIS
| > 9.0. We should know more about this following the OAG
| > meeting scheduled for the end of this month.
|
| is there an action to ensure UBL's committed position on item (2) and
| (3) will be finalised by then? I think the onus is on us to take the
| initaitive or we will just cycle round again.
I think that two things are needed here:
1. The inclusion of CCTS schema alignment on our "to do" list for
1.1. I've already got this entered on a list that I will be
putting out for review and approval once we've got the 1.0
packaging done.
2. The appointment of a team to actually engage with our
counterparts in OAG so that we have something done in time for
1.1. This is harder. Are there volunteers?
Jon
