Re: [ubl] Index review #2

Jon wrote


> | 1.  Typo in Section D.2
> | 
> | Jon wrote:
> | > | D.2 first paragraph "be specified, as must the "fittings&#x201D
> | > | (handles, stays etc.)"
> | >
> | > Is there a change here?
> | >
> | 
> | There is a semi-colon missing from "“fittings&#x201D"
> 
> As the parenthetical phrase belongs to "fittings", no semicolon is
> needed in that place.
> 

Sorry, Jon, I meant the &#x201D has its final semi-colon missing
which causes the browser to display it literally as '&#x201D'
rather than, I think it should be, a double end-quote.

Steve