Unused anchors never hurt anybody, I don't see why they should
be either pointed at or removed. In fact they provide anchors
for third parties to link into the document. What's wrong with
that?
On 04/21/2004 05:27 PM, wrote:
> [:]
>
> | Attached you will find a physical report of broken links (none)
> | and other factors in the UBL distibution as it currently
> | stands. Please note that although there are no broken hyperlinks
> | there is a number of broken local anchors.
>
> The unused anchors are in the CM and FS pieces. I trust that the
> authors will take these out in the next revisions; no need to
> bother with them now.
>
> Jon
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
--
Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail:
Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442
Sun Microsystems Inc. | W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD
