MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)
From:
To: ,
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
[:]
| Both of your messages are excellent examples that emphasize the
| need for a structured QA process for the spreadsheets, models, and
| schema. IMHO, we need to develop a structured, systematic,
| repeatable process for review and QA that reduces differences in
| the future, and, reduces the amount of time spent for review and
| re-review. Other industry groups and standards bodies that I
| participate in have found a similar need mandatory, not just an
| option. I would like to suggest that the SSC TC form a QA
| workgroup that will be responsible for QA of all UBL releases. If
| such a group is formed, I will gladly volunteer to participate.
I will put this on the work list as a discussion item for UBL 1.1.
Jon
