MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Michaels homework as of AW: [ubl] Minutes: UBL TC Atlantic Call June 2 2004 ad 6. Corrections to UBL 1.0 CD action items
From: "Stephen Green" <>
To: "Mavis Cournane" <>,<>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:29:31 +0100
Mavis and UBL TC
Thanks to Michael for his work on this comparison.
I've taken it a stage further but, following Michael's
method of 'diff' with the spreadsheet, I actually was
able to perform the diff so, Mavis, I think I've done
your part too. I've reduced everything to three
worksheets in a single spreadsheet, one for EF, one
for the committee draft spreadsheets (documents
and reusable combined) and a third with a diff
formula. I only included columns which were typically
consistent between EF and package spreadsheets and
I aligned the order of BIEs.
There are just a few differences, apart from those due
to different approaches in EF and the package.
In Reusable
Address. Street Name. Text
Representation Term:
"Name" in EF vs "Text" in package spreadsheet
Allowance Charge. Reason. Code
Data Type Qualifier:
"Allowance Charge Reason" in EF vs "" in package spreadsheet
Exchange Rate. Operator. Code
Data Type Qualifier:
"" in EF vs "Operator" in package spreadsheet
Payment Means. Payment Means. Code
Property Term Qualifier:
"Payment" in EF vs "" in package spreadsheet
In Order Change
Order Change. Line_ Extension Total. UBL_ Amount
Data Type Qualifier:
"UBL" in EF vs "" in package spreadsheet
This appears to have been very useful in highlighting the possible 'bugs'
All the best
Steve
