← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

To Comment 11 of 1.0 isses 20040721

From
Gunther Stuhec
Date
2004-07-26T10:30:00+00:00
ID
Thread
To Comment 11 of 1.0 isses 20040721
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: To Comment 11 of 1.0 isses 20040721




From: "Stuhec, Gunther" <>
To: "''" <>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:29:56 +0200






Hello Jon,

I said that the he namespaces are not based on the namespace rules of chapter 3.4.2 of wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc.

The chapter 3.4.2 says that the namespace names for UBL schemas must be based on:

for drafts:
===========
urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:<name>:<major>:<minor>[<revision>]

for standard:
=============
urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:<name>:<major>:<minor>

And as comparsion, here some examples of the current namespaces of UBL Versions 1.0:
urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonAggregateComponents:1:0
urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:codelist:SubstitutionStatusCode:1:0


This namespaces do not have the term "schema" between ubl and <name>.

This must be corrected either in ther namespace or in the specific chapter of the Naming and Design Rules.

Kind regards,

	Gunther
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →