AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.8" of 1.0 isses 20040721

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.8" of 1.0 isses 20040721




From: "Stuhec, Gunther" <>
To: "''" <>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:14:05 +0200






Title: Nachricht



Hello 
Mark,
 
I have 
reviewed the documents only partially. But that what I had seen was very 
confusing and not a very consistent and clean modelling approach. I does not 
reflect our NDR guidelines. That is right, if we're using the Garden of Eden 
approach, all elements to be qualified in the instance document. Otherwise is 
the implementation of schemas into applications and the processing by this 
applications not very easy.
 
Kind 
regards,
 
    Gunther
 

-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: 
 [mailto:]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. 
Juli 2004 05:19
An: Stuhec, Gunther; 
Cc: 

Betreff: RE: [ubl] To Comment "a.8" of 1.0 
isses 20040721



  
  In reviewing the instance 
  documents, this problem is more widespread than just local element 
  declarations that are unqualified.  There are some other BBIEs that are 
  also unqualified.  NDR intended for ALL elements to be qualified in the 
  instance document regardless of their origin.
   
  Mark
  

  
  From: Stuhec, Gunther 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Mon 7/26/2004 7:12 
  AM
To: ''
Cc: 
  
Subject: AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.8" of 1.0 
  isses 20040721


  
  Hello Jon,

I said in comment "a.8" that some ag names 
  are prefixed by namespace prefix and others not. Sorry that was a mistake from 
  my side. Because I have seen now, that this schema-representation comes from 
  rule [ELD2] "All element declarations MUST be global with the exception of ID 
  and Code which MUST be local.". This requires implicitly that the local 
  declared element must be prefixed, if the elements are qualified (See rule 
  [GXS1] "UBL Schema MUST conform to the following physical layout as 
  applicable:").

But I have to say anyway that these rules confuse the 
  implementors and the users. I got many questions about this from some 
  colleagues. They can't understand, why the handling of elements are 
  different.

Kind 
  regards,

        Gunther

To 
  unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
  OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.














[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]