Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [ubl] UBL draft 11
Title: Re: [ubl] UBL draft 11 Tim, See below M Mark Leitch From: Tim McGrath <> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:24:48 +0800 To: Peter Larsen Borresen <> Cc: "''" <>, 'Flemming Beltoft' <> Subject: Re: [ubl] UBL draft 11 A few main points that I wanted to check ... a. Self Billed Invoice is the same structure as an Invoice except for optionally having multiple statement references. I don’t think that either should have statement reference; in my draft 10 notes for the self billed invoice I recommended the removal of this association. b. Self Billed Credit Note is exactly the same structure as Credit Note. Only the definitions change. Yes. The sender and recipient swap and, whereas the reference in a Credit Note will be to an Invoice, the reference in a Self Billed Credit Note will be to a Self Billed Invoice c. Statement appears to have no Billing Document Reference. Statement should not have a Billing Document Reference, but Statement Line should. This is an omission. Am I correct? Peter Larsen Borresen wrote: Dear TC Please find UBL draft 11 as spreadsheet, edifix model and schemas with attached below. The upadates of the definitions provided by Mark Leith has not been included. The model is still for review in the procurement group. Kind regards Peter <<mod.zip>> <<UBL2.0_draft11.zip>> <<xsd.zip>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services http://www.docengineering.com/
Next in thread →
Next in month →