(because of my absence tomorrow, I'll offer my comments here)
At 2006-04-04 14:46 +0200, Peter Borresen wrote:
>"UBL restricts use of xsd:any to extensions. There can only be two
>usages of xsd:any in a document; one in the end of a line element
>and one as the last element of the document. The content of a
>xsd:any must point to a well known schema, approved by the UBL TC,
>UBL subcommitee or a UBL localization group."
As mentioned moments ago in a response to Mike, I would like to see
this at the end of the party type.
>To be able to track how the instance was generated the following
>process-instruction SHOULD be added to each document instances:
>
><?InstanceInfo
> Creator="<person or application (inklusiv full verison
> attributes) that has generated the document"
> Created="<date and time the document was send>"
>?>
I disagree ... I'm quite wary of standardizing processing
instructions. A PI is a directive to a processing application ...
the data quoted above doesn't feel like a processing directive ... it
feels just like more data.
>To be able to track what version of schemas an instance was
>generated from the following attributes SHOULD be present in each document:
> * MinorVersion
> * Context
> * Subset
> * Profile
What is the difference between a context, a subset and a profile?
. . . . . . . Ken
--
Registration open for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Wash.,DC 2006-06-12/16
World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training.
G. Ken Holman mailto:
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
