[ubl] CDL9

From: <>
Date: 2006-07-21T03:25:20+00:00
ID
Thread: [ubl] CDL9

Hi,

Just noticed that CDL9 is probably still valid in the context of the QDT module, and should therefore not be replaced. Do you agree with my interpretation?

Regards
Juerg

View original preserved HTML → View on OASIS Connected Community →

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →