> another point is that the entries in the NDR are incorrect
and stale - shouldn't we just remove them?
Yep.
From: Tim McGrath
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, 06 July 2006
2024
To: Grimley Michael J NPRI
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ubl] Apprvd. Acrynm &
Abbrv. upd8?
thats fine, consider my list the start of this. another point
is that the entries in the NDR are incorrect and stale - shouldn't we just
remove them?
Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote:
The decision was made some time ago that the list
would be managed, outside of NDR, by the TC as a whole. as stated in
Appendix B of the latest draft:
"This list will henceforth be maintained by
the UBL TC as a committee of the whole, and additions included in current
and future versions of the UBL standard will be maintained and published
separately."
