← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Gefeg proposes changes in CommonExtensionComponents

From
Lemming Alan Lund <>
Date
2006-09-06T09:35:59+00:00
ID
Thread
Gefeg proposes changes in CommonExtensionComponents
Title: AW: First PRD3 Schema Review

Hi

 

I dont thinks its at problem using cbc in 
the CommonExtensionComponents. 

 

But respond asap. Gefeg is working on this 
today.

 

________________________________________
Alan 
Lund Lemming

WM-data
Lautrupvang 10
2750 Ballerup
Tlf.: +45 44 78 40 00 

Fax: +45 44 78 40 01 
Mobil: +45 25 18 81 58

Skype: 
alanlemming
mailto:
http://www.wmdata.dk

 

The 
information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact 
the sender and delete the material from any 
computer.

Fra: Frank Rast 
[mailto:]
Sendt: on 06-09-2006 11:34
Til: 
Lemming Alan Lund
Cc: Michael Dill; David Kruppke; Sylvia 
Webb
Emne: AW: First PRD3 Schema Review

Hi Alan,

we proposed changes to the 
UBL-CommonExtensionComponents-2.0.xsd.

These proposed changes to 
UBL-CommonExtensionComponents-2.0.xsd in detail
are:

- remove the cbc 
namespace declaration
- remove the cbc import
- define ExtensionID as 
element
- substitute cbc:ID with ExtensionID
- define ExtensionName as 
element
- substitute cbc:Name with ExtensionName

The reasons for 
these changes are:

- a dependancy to cbc is not wanted because the cbc 
schema is derived from
the ccts data model.
- a cyclic dependency would be 
introduced into the namespace dependancy
graph of 
ubl

    illustration by 
prefix:

       ext <--- 
maindoc
        
^         
|
        
|         
|
        
|         
|
       cbc <------*

- the naming 
scheme of the referenced elements in UBLExtensionType is to
prefix element 
names with "Extension" the use of ID and Name is an
exception to the naming 
scheme

Until we get a ok for this proposal we will use 
the
UBL-CommonExtensionComponents-2.0.xsd provided by you.
Since these are 
only minor changes that do have any impact on the semantic
expressed in the 
schema we hope it will be ok.

Best regards,

Frank 
Rast

=========================================
GEFEG mbH
Storkower 
Strasse 207
D-10369 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 97 99 14 57
Fax.: +49 30 97 99 
14 22
Mailto:
=========================================
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread