← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order2.0

From
Mark Leitch <>
Date
2006-09-04T07:32:30+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order2.0
Title: Re: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0

I also agree that the QuotationDocumentRefereence should be allowed for Quotations outside UBL.

M 

Mark Leitch

Director - Tritorr Ltd

tel.:       +44 1932 821112

cell.:      +44 7881 822999

mail:      

skype:    wmarkle

site:       www.tritorr.com

From: Peter Borresen <>

Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:35:47 +0200

To: Tim McGrath <>, Martin Forsberg <>

Cc: <>, <>

Conversation: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0

Subject: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0

Is the opinion that we should use QuotationDocumentReference even if the quotation is not an UBL message? I tend to agree with that.

 

Kind regards

 

Peter 

 

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----

Fra: Tim McGrath  [mailto:]

Sendt: 1. september 2006  04:30

Til: Martin Forsberg

Cc: ;  

Emne: Re: SV: [ubl] Question about document  reference in UBL Order 2.0

I agree with Martin.  Use  qualified associations where possible.  That way the name reflects the  usage and we dont rely on values in the document content.

In this case  the use of LineReference for the Quotation should not be a problem. Its usage  would depend on the business case.  

If the two faxes came as  separate Quotations then you would specify Line 1 for the car and its  DocumentReference (and Attachment).  You would also specify Line 1 for  the truck service and its DocumentReference (and Attachment).  

If  the two faxes came on the same Quotation then you would have line numbers (or  similar) to identify them.  So you could specifiy Line 1 being the car  and Line 2 being the truck service.  Both of which would identfy the same  DocumentReference (being the Quotation) but different  Attachments.

Martin Forsberg wrote:

 

  

 

Hi Alan,

 

 

 

I know that we have discussed that all  document references in UBL that reference a document type that is also part  of UBL 2 (like QuotationDocumentReference) should be qualified. Other  documents not part of UBL like Inventory report or contract should use the  unqualified DocumentReference and use the document type code to specify what  kind of document is referenced.

 

 

 

So from my point of view, you should  use the qualified reference. Though there might be a problem if you want to  use QuotationLineReference without knowing the line number (that is  mandatory).

 

 

 

/Martin Forsberg

 

 

 Från: Lemming Alan Lund [mailto:]

Skickat:  to 2006-08-31 14:18

Till: ; 

Ämne:  [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0

 

 

Hi All

I have at question about usage of document  reference i documents. Is

usage described below correct?

In a case  where a customer receives two faxes with quotations for

different goods:  1. A car for sale, 2 Maintanance service for a truck.

The customer  sends a UBL Order to order both items in one UBL Order and

he want to  attach the faxes for reference. The costomer should therefore

attach the  faxes to the order using Order->Orderline->DocumentReference

, in  an appropriate  imageformat.

Order->Orderline->QuotationLineReference->DocumentReference  should NOT

be used since the format I  non-UBL.

________________________________________

Alan  Lund Lemming

WM-data

Lautrupvang 10

2750  Ballerup

Denmark

Phone: +45 44 78 40 00

Fax: +45 44 78 40  01

Mobile: +45 25 18 81 58

Skype: alanlemming

mailto:

http://www.wmdata.dk <http://www.wmdata.dk/>

The  information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity  to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or  privileged

material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or  other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information  by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you

received this in error, please contact the sender and delete  the

material from any computer.

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/434 - Release Date: 30/08/2006

  

-- 

regards

tim mcgrath

phone: +618 93352228  

postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →