← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order2.0
Title: Re: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0 I also agree that the QuotationDocumentRefereence should be allowed for Quotations outside UBL. M Mark Leitch Director - Tritorr Ltd tel.: +44 1932 821112 cell.: +44 7881 822999 mail: skype: wmarkle site: www.tritorr.com From: Peter Borresen <> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:35:47 +0200 To: Tim McGrath <>, Martin Forsberg <> Cc: <>, <> Conversation: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0 Subject: SV: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0 Is the opinion that we should use QuotationDocumentReference even if the quotation is not an UBL message? I tend to agree with that. Kind regards Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:] Sendt: 1. september 2006 04:30 Til: Martin Forsberg Cc: ; Emne: Re: SV: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0 I agree with Martin. Use qualified associations where possible. That way the name reflects the usage and we dont rely on values in the document content. In this case the use of LineReference for the Quotation should not be a problem. Its usage would depend on the business case. If the two faxes came as separate Quotations then you would specify Line 1 for the car and its DocumentReference (and Attachment). You would also specify Line 1 for the truck service and its DocumentReference (and Attachment). If the two faxes came on the same Quotation then you would have line numbers (or similar) to identify them. So you could specifiy Line 1 being the car and Line 2 being the truck service. Both of which would identfy the same DocumentReference (being the Quotation) but different Attachments. Martin Forsberg wrote: Hi Alan, I know that we have discussed that all document references in UBL that reference a document type that is also part of UBL 2 (like QuotationDocumentReference) should be qualified. Other documents not part of UBL like Inventory report or contract should use the unqualified DocumentReference and use the document type code to specify what kind of document is referenced. So from my point of view, you should use the qualified reference. Though there might be a problem if you want to use QuotationLineReference without knowing the line number (that is mandatory). /Martin Forsberg Från: Lemming Alan Lund [mailto:] Skickat: to 2006-08-31 14:18 Till: ; Ämne: [ubl] Question about document reference in UBL Order 2.0 Hi All I have at question about usage of document reference i documents. Is usage described below correct? In a case where a customer receives two faxes with quotations for different goods: 1. A car for sale, 2 Maintanance service for a truck. The customer sends a UBL Order to order both items in one UBL Order and he want to attach the faxes for reference. The costomer should therefore attach the faxes to the order using Order->Orderline->DocumentReference , in an appropriate imageformat. Order->Orderline->QuotationLineReference->DocumentReference should NOT be used since the format I non-UBL. ________________________________________ Alan Lund Lemming WM-data Lautrupvang 10 2750 Ballerup Denmark Phone: +45 44 78 40 00 Fax: +45 44 78 40 01 Mobile: +45 25 18 81 58 Skype: alanlemming mailto: http://www.wmdata.dk <http://www.wmdata.dk/> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/434 - Release Date: 30/08/2006 -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →