Re: Re: [ubl] Re: More typos in the IDD spreadsheets and UBL 2.0spreadsheet models

>
> At 2007-09-05 12:06 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote:
>
> Other than those 6, the set of DENs found in
> CommonAggregateComponents XSD and document XSD files matches the set
> of DENs found in the massaged IDD spreadsheets.
>
> So I think the XSD documentation of the DEN and other columns is
> incorrect in four places because the algorithm acted on invalid
> component cell values in the master spreadsheet.  None of these XSD
> changes will affect schema-validity of UBL instances.  I think the
> other two differences are repairs to the IDD DEN values.
>
> Tim, can you confirm this please?
>
>

yes, i agree - you are correct.
> Thanks!
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken

--
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228
postal: po box 1289
fremantle
western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath