hopefully this covers all the issues. let me know if i missed any....
Arianna Brutti wrote:
> - finally I have some questions about the tasks (one question for
> Fulya, several questions for TIm); Tim, Fulya, please, find your name
> name below.
>
>> "Capability//Value" (2)
>> Capability. Value. Amount
>> Capability. Value. Quantity
>
> Tim, I am not sure about this ... is "Value" the qualifier for both?
>
Yes, they should be:
Capability. Value_ Amount. Amount
Capability. Value_ Quantity. Quantity
>>
>
> DONE: now all representation terms are "Name"
> Question for TIM: making the corrections I discovered that the
> cardinality of Regulation.Name is 1..1. I think it should be 1..n,
> isn't it?
yes, to support multiple language expressions of the name,
>
>
>
> Question for TIM: in Transport Equipment there is also Transport
> Equipment. Tare Weight_ Measure. Measure ... should it change for
> Transport Equipment. Tare_ Weight. Measure?
>
yes
>> "MaximumQuantity": inconsistent naming components (6)
>> Awarding Criteria. Maximum. Quantity
>> Delivery. Maximum_ Quantity. Quantity **
>> Economic Operator Short List. Maximum. Quantity
>> Item Location Quantity. Maximum_ Quantity. Quantity **
>> Line Item. Maximum_ Quantity. Quantity **
>> Request For Tender Line. Maximum_ Quantity. Quantity **
>
> DONE: all components have been alligned to Delivery. Maximum_
> Quantity. Quantity
>
> Question for TIM: in the Economic Operator Short List there was
> Economic Operator Short List. Expected. Quantity ... I changed it for
> Economic Operator Short List. Expected_ Quantity. Quantity ... is it ok?
>
yes, very good pick up. "Economic Operator Short List. Expected" has no
independent meaning so it needs to have Quantity as the Property Term.
>> "TaxExclusiveAmount": inconsistent naming components (2)
>> Budget Amount. Tax Exclusive. Amount
>> Monetary Total. Tax Exclusive Amount. Amount **
>
> DONE: all components have been alligned to Monetary Total. Tax
> Exclusive_ Amount. Amount
>
> TIM, please, confirm that is right because in your mail you wrote that
> it should be Monetary Total. Tax Exclusive Amount. Amount but I
> suspect that it was a typing error.
yes i missed the underscore.
> Furthermore, in Budget Amount there was Budget Amount. Minimum. Amount
> ... I changed it for Budget Amount. Minimum_ Amount .. is it ok?
>
yes - you are better at this than me.
>
>> "LineExtensionAmount": inconsistent naming components (9)
>> Consumption Line. Line Extension_ Amount. Amount
>> Credit Note Line. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Debit Note Line. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Invoice Line. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Line Item. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Monetary Total. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Quotation Line. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Telecommunications Supply Line. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>> Tender Line. Line Extension Amount. Amount **
>
> DONE: all components alligned to Consumption Line. Line Extension_
> Amount. Amount
>
> Question for TIM :in Monetary Total there are a lot of "Amount" ...
> should they be qualified like Line Extension Amount?
on closer inspection i prefer as follows...
Monetary Total. Line Extension Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Tax_ Exclusive Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Tax_ Inclusive Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Allowance_ Total Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Charge_ Total Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Prepaid Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Payable_ Rounding Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Payable_ Amount. Amount
Monetary Total. Payable_ Alternative Amount. Amount
