← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [ubl] PRD3 suggestion: sample instances with unconventional namespace prefixes
G. Ken Holman wrote: > What more input to the documentation do you need other than the following? > >> G. Ken Holman wrote: >>> UBL-Invoice-2.0-Example.xml - (PRD1) document element in the default >>> namespace >>> UBL-Invoice-2.0-Example-NS1.xml - no elements in the default namespace >>> UBL-Invoice-2.0-Example-NS2.xml - basics in the default namespace >>> UBL-Invoice-2.0-Example-NS3.xml - aggregates in the default namespace >>> UBL-Invoice-2.0-Example-NS4.xml - embedded and overloaded use of >>> prefixes I think that will do it. Jon
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →