RE: [ubl] Any comments on the propose Explanatory Nots for the UBL 2.1 PAS submission to ISO-IEC JTC1

From
Duvekot, Kees <>
Date
2014-02-21T14:48:16+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ubl] Any comments on the propose Explanatory Nots for the UBL 2.1 PAS submission to ISO-IEC JTC1
Tim,

In the following paragraph 7.4.3.2. ( Alignment : Adaptability and Migration) noting is mentioned about adaptability .. do we need to mention the "extension logic" that was implemented to adapt the standard in a controlled way for a specific implementation? I think that clearly falls under the term  "Adaptability".

And can you change "Wehkamp" in "RFS Holland Holding (wehkamp.nl)" in the "-- Quality : Completeness and Stability" section. 

For the rest no additional comments,

Kees Duvekot


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van:  [mailto:] Namens Tim McGrath
Verzonden: vrijdag 21 februari 2014 7:37
Aan: '' Language
Onderwerp: [ubl] Any comments on the propose Explanatory Nots for the UBL 2.1 PAS submission to ISO-IEC JTC1

OASIS have drafted a short explanatory note for JTC 1 about the PAS submission of UBL 2.1 and asked us for any comments.  I have uploaded a copy of this draft (with my comments) to:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/download.php/52284/UBL%20PAS%20Explanatory%20Note%20INTERNAL%20DRAFT%20%20v3%20%202014.docx

Please read this and send any comments  (to this UBL list) before Feb 26th so we can finalize this on the call(s) that day.


Note: we are not 'approving' this - it is just an opportunity to provide feedback for OASIS.


-----------------
Regards 
Tim McGrath

Fremantle, Western Australia
http://www.documentengineeringservices.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php