RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

From
"Hovernor Kames"
Date
2005-06-24T09:22:11+00:00
ID
B255F1865C25DB44890F90640604F1A7015DD0E0@mail-15ps
Thread
RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
Yes, sorry to say it Tom but I have had a
few people tell me, primarily from IBM and Microsoft, that ebXML is dead, that
WS-I associated standards are the only ones that matter, and that the WS-I
stack will simply end up replacing the entire ebXML stack. Calling a technology
dead, which has some adoption already but also has some overlap with another
stack, is the very definition of FUD. 

 

It would be nice to think people that work
on standards wouldn’t use such tactics in order to get their own chosen
standards adopted, but it would also be na鴳e. We all know just how political
the standards process is. Twas ever thus and twill ever be.

 

Let me know if you would like to discuss
this further.

 

From:
Tom Glover [mailto:] 

Sent: 23 June 2005 06:36

To: Governor James

Cc: J鷨gen Thyme;


Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML
registry and UDDI comparisons

 

WS-I Fud?

Tom Glover, Senior Program Manager, Web Services Standards, IBM Software Group 

email/sametime:  | external:
905.413.4220 | IBM tieline: 969-4220 

my blogs: external html | internal (html , rss) 

Wendy Burton, Assistant & Project Manager, IBM Software Group 

email/sametime:  | external:
905.413.2549 | IBM tieline: 969-2549 

 

  
  
"Governor James"
  <> 

  
06/22/2005 10:02 AM 

  
  
  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
J鷨gen Thyme <>,
    <> 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
 

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI
    comparisons

    
   

  
  
 

  
   

    
    
 

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

Sun already supports a dual registry strategy, as
does infravio. Others are likely to follow, WS-I fud notwithstanding.

  

Coexistence is surely the best approach. 

  

  

  

  

  

 

From: J鷨gen Thyme
[mailto:] 

Sent: 22 June 2005 13:54

To: 

Subject: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

  

I have
looked at the specs for v3 for the ebXML registry. Although the information
model looks more detailed than in UDDI my immediate thinking was that adding my
taxonomies in UDDI I can achieve a lot. And there are several implementations
of UDDI. 

 

What
are your thoughts? Will vendors of UDDI registries add ebXML registry
functionality to their existing products? Or will there be a complete new set
of registry products coming? 

 

 

Best
regards / Med venlig hilsen 

 

J鷨gen
Thyme 

 

Development
Team

Globeteam A/S

Gentoftegade 118-120

DK-2820 Gentofte

Tlf.: +45 70 26 29 70

Fax.: +45 70 26 29 80 

Mobil:
+45 40 90 41 67