RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

From
"Eaniel Geygin"
Date
2005-06-22T14:43:51+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
J鷨gen,

 

I personally do not see any new ebXML registries coming 
or a compelling reason for them to come. The only viable ebXML Registry 
implementations I know of (Infravio [1] and Sun [2]) support both ebXML and 
UDDI, which I take as a consumer empowerment sales tactic. In my admittedly 
biased view, the momentum is certainly on the UDDI side with all SOA-enabling 
infrastructure (message/protocol intermediation brokers, development and 
management tools) shipping with built-in support for UDDI only. Because registry 
is not so much a feature of an architecture as it is its platform supporting 
specific capabilities, its value is proportional to the number of systems that 
leverage it. There simply isn't enough of a market opportunity or a viable 
go-to-market strategy for an alternative universal registry standard at this 
time.

 

Although SOA transformation is what drives a lot of 
infrastructure spending these days, I do believe that ebXML Registry has a 
defensible niche in B2B collaboration in specific verticals. Whether there is 
enough of a vendor ecosystem and innovation around ebXML to sustain it is 
another matter.

 

Somewhat tangential to your inquiry, I may note that if 
you are accessing the registry from within a Java platform, you may use JAXR 
(Java API for XML Registries), which is designed to support both ebXML and 
UDDI information models and API's through a common client interface. However it 
is unlikely that you will be able to run the same code against both ebXML and 
UDDI registries without change.

 

Regards,

Daniel

 

[1] http://www.infravio.com/products.php#x-reg

[2] http://www.sun.com/products/soa/registry/

 

From: J鷨gen Thyme [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 4:54 PM
To: 

Subject: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and 
UDDI comparisons

I have looked at the specs for v3 
for the ebXML registry. Although the information model looks more detailed than 
in UDDI my immediate thinking was that adding my taxonomies in UDDI I can 
achieve a lot. And there are several implementations of 
UDDI.

 

What are your thoughts? Will vendors 
of UDDI registries add ebXML registry functionality to their existing products? 
Or will there be a complete new set of registry products 
coming?

 

 

Best regards / Med 
venlig hilsen

 

J鷨gen 
Thyme

 

Development 
Team
Globeteam A/S
Gentoftegade 118-120
DK-2820 
Gentofte

Tlf.: +45 70 26 
29 70
Fax.: +45 70 26 29 80

Mobil: +45 40 90 41 
67



 

smime.p7s