RE: [uima] UIMA Specification Next Steps and Next Telecon Schedule

From
"Oascal Doupet"
Date
2008-10-09T21:06:42+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [uima] UIMA Specification Next Steps and Next Telecon Schedule
October is better for me to. 

 

Pascal

From: David Ferrucci [mailto:]
Sent: Thu 09/10/2008 22:31
To: Thomas Hampp
Cc: ; 
Subject: [uima] UIMA Specification Next Steps and Next Telecon Schedule

Ok, Lets change the next telecon to October 24th. 
Anyone have a an objection? 

-Dave 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
David A. Ferrucci, PhD
Senior Manager, Semantic Analysis & Integration 
Chief Architect,  UIMA
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
Tel: 914-784-7847, 8/863-7847

------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ibm.com/research/uima   

Thomas Hampp <> 

10/09/2008 07:50 AM 

To

 

cc

 

Subject

Re: [uima] reschedule/clarification [Re: [uima] UIMA Specification Next Steps and Next Telecon Scheduled for October 17th.]

Oct. 24th would work for me but 17th is also OK. 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards 

  

Thomas Hampp-Bahnmueller 

 
 
 

t 

 

Phone: 
+49-7031-16-3372 
 IBM Deutschland 

E-Mail: 
 
 Schoenaicher Str. 220 

 71032 Boeblingen 

 Germany 

 

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter 
Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 
  

From: 
 

To: 
David Ferrucci <> 

Cc: 
 

Date: 
08.10.08 14:43 

Subject: 
[uima] reschedule/clarification [Re: [uima] UIMA Specification Next Steps and Next Telecon Scheduled for October 17th.]

Folks,

Dave has scheduled the next telecon for October 17th. Unfortunately I'll 
be at a meeting in D.C. that day. Would it be possible for us to 
reschedule the telecon to the following Friday (Oct. 24th)?

Dave, I have a clarification about the Statements of Use. Can we just 
take a look at the UIMA apps we've built, and identify which parts of 
the spec are utilized? Should we also be taking a look at the current 
JDK in the same manner, or is the issue to look at applications 
("usages") rather than implementations of the framework?

-ehn

David Ferrucci wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> The UIMA Committee Draft's 60-day public review period ends on October 
> 8th. There have been no comments so far.
> 
> The Next Step is for our committee to vote to approve the draft as a 
> "Committee Specification".
> 
> *On October 17th at 11AM (our usual time)  *we will convene our next 
>  telecon to kick off a ballot to approve the committee draft as a 
> "Committee Specification".
> 
> Then we need to acquire three(3)  "Statements of Use". These brief 
> statements would mention a usage of UIMA that conforms to one or more 
> parts of the specification, for example the XMI specification.
> 
> These "Statements of Use" get included as part of the submission to 
> OASIS for consideration of UIMA as an OASIS standard.
> 
> Hope to speak with you all on October 17th
> 
> If you have a conflict and can NOT attend on October 17th, then  please 
> let me know and we can try to reschedule.
> 
> Regards,
>         Dave
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> David A. Ferrucci, PhD
> Senior Manager, Semantic Analysis & Integration
> Chief Architect,  UIMA
> IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> 19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
> Tel: 914-784-7847, 8/863-7847
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.ibm.com/research/uima  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php