AW: [uiml] Conformance section for the UIML specification.

Same for me, though I am not sure whether this is sufficient (I suspect 
something would need

to be added to avoid that somebody claims the UIML label having only 
implemented an extremely small

subset of the standard which - of course - does adhere to the constraints 
etc. of the remainder).

 

BR,

Heinz-Josef

  

  
  Von: Robbie Schaefer 
  [mailto:] 
Gesendet: Tuesday, May 20, 
  2008 8:12 AM
An: Jim Helms
Cc: 
  
Betreff: Re: [uiml] Conformance section 
  for the UIML specification.

  

Hi Jim,

that sounds sensible to me. I don't have anything to 
  add.

All the best,
Robbie.

  
2008/5/18 Jim Helms <>:

  Hello 
    all,

Mary has pointed out that the current specification doesn't 
    include a
Conformance section as described by the following paragraph 
    from the
TC process:

"A specification that is approved by the TC 
    at the Public Review
Draft, Committee Specification or OASIS Standard 
    level must include a
separate section, listing a set of numbered 
    conformance clauses, to
which any implementation of the specification 
    must adhere in order to
claim conformance to the specification (or any 
    optional portion
thereof)."

At the moment I think the only real 
    conformance clause we have is that
any implementation of the 
    specification must adhere to the constraints
and restrictions implied by 
    the definitions for each element in the
specification.  Does anyone 
    have suggestions about what else should be
included in this 
    section?

Thank 
    you!
Jim

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
    unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC 
    that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your 
    TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php