Re: [PATCH] used ring: define the meaning and requirements of the len field.

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <> writes:
> So, if you think we should include this in 1.0 cs03, then you
> need to vote no on the cs03 ballot, and we'll
> redo a draft with these changes applied.

On balance, I think that is necessary.  I hate to think of an
implementation getting this wrong.

I encourage others to change their votes to No too.

Thanks,
Rusty.