On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:44:13PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> writes: >
> OK, now we have a basic document in latex, here is the >
> list of items we must complete to publish draft: > > > > - clean place-holder appendix B - I'll do this shortly > > > > - non-normative references - do we have any? > > - related work - do we have any? > > - declared xml namespaces - do we have any? >
> Thanks, >
>
I'm actually on vacation this week, so I won't be active until
> the weekend. > >
> If not let's remove above sections. >
> Indeed. > > > - fill in conformance section: what exactly goes here? >
>
do we just require all "must" conditions are met? >
> I don't know... if we can't copy someone else, just refer to the RFC. OK I'll put this text in for now - basically say do all MUST and don't do any MUST NOT - but this requires we make MUST in spec text much more explicit. We have whole sections with no MUST SHOULD or MAY - they aren't all non-normative, are they? This can be made clearer during review period though. > > - fix MUST/SHOULD etc to must/should for consistency >
>
or did we change our mind on this? I don't care but >
>
if we don't mark them with upper case do we need to copy >
>
required stuff to conformance section? if not how do people find it? >
> Let's go upper case. I prefer that anyway, and the standard you cribbed
> the latex from used upper case too. OK, I'll revert to that. > > - fill in acknowledgements for non-editors who contributed > > > > >
> Additionally we can do all kind of pretty-printing, I think >
> it's nice to have but not a must for draft 1. >
> Indeed. >
> I have some tweaks I will send through; they're based on the text
> version but I can apply them manually to the tex source. >
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
