Re: [virtio] tc process: we need changebars?

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:37:59PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:12 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I recently looked at
> > https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process
> > and I have a question:
> > 
> > 	The initial public review of a public review draft must take place for a
> > 	minimum of 30 days, and any subsequent reviews must be held for a
> > 	minimum of 15 days. Changes made to a committee draft after a review
> > 	must be clearly identified in any subsequent review, and the subsequent
> > 	review shall be limited in scope to changes made in the previous review. 
> > 
> > how are we going to identify changes to reviewers?
> > we probably can use changebar and then \cbstart / \cbend manually.
> > Tried latexdiff withou tmuch success.
> > Other ideas?
> 
> This is all the ctan change log and doc management projects:
> 
> http://www.ctan.org/topic/doc-mgmt
> 
> I'm afraid the internet does think latexdiff to be the best one
> though ... perhaps we should give it another try?

Well latexdiff is merely an automated way to add markup.
We still need to fix \cbstart / \cbend to work with xetex ...

> The package I used for my thesis (~20 years ago) isn't even available
> anymore, so I'm afraid I have no current experience.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php