On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:54:24PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 13:24 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >
> OK I will try this but I note this gives us back >
> DIFaddbegin/DIFaddend. >
> You are saying with egingroup/endgroup color stack >
> overflow errors go away? >
> Yes. Commands like color apply to a single group, usually marked with
> curly brackets {xxx}, with group and egingroup (there's some subtle
> difference I don't really understand; enough to say that group didn't
> work for me ;-). I have no idea why are they pushed to a stack, if there
> seem to be no pop operation, but just enclosing a change in a separate
> group seems enough. That's what my first proposal did (notice extra {}
> in DIFaddtex), but as you pointed out it missed some bits. > >
> How about footnotes? >
> Is there a way to fix them without an external script? >
> Would be nice if the footnote mark was also crossed-out ... >
> Right, my first version did it, then I forgot to check it. Anyway, this > (slightly suboptimal, but I couldn't care less) should cover all cases > (I see footnotes on page 59 coloured): The one on page 78 does not seem coloured.
--
MST
