virtio 1.0 errata

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:12:03 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote:
> ok we have a somewhat major issue with
> incorrect ring size listed in the table:
> VIRTIO-120 >
> this seems to warrant errata release,
> and we can fix the ugly ldots: VIRTIO-115  I agree that we want an errata release for these.  >
> anything else that's small and urgent enough that it can and should go
> in errata?  The (mostly cosmetic) section alignment for virtio-block (VIRTIO-125) I just posted is certainly small, but I don't think I'd classify it as urgent.