On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > I agree that this doesn't seem optimal. This is a much bigger change
> > than anything between virtio 0.9 and in virtio 1.0, because it affects
> > the data path directly.
>
> Nod. It looks in pretty good shape to me, once we fixed up the things I
> noticed during this round, but I still feel a bit uncomfortable without
> a prototype for non-pci.
>
> One issue for me is that all work has been done with pci as the
> transport, and with a view as to what could be helpful for implementers
> of pci cards. There's nothing inherently bad in that, but it does
> introduce a chance that other transports may run into problems when
> they try to implement it.
>
> Not an insurmountable problem, but something that should be kept in
> mind.
What do you suggest then?
--
MST
