On 02/12/2018 01:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100
> Halil Pasic <> wrote:
>
> s/precise/precise about/
Nod. Should I spin a v2 or is it better handled
via fixup by maintainer?
>
>> Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as virtio 1.0. This
>> could become confusing when we bump the version of the virtio
>> specification to 1.1, in a sense that it could be interpreted like one
>> can not use any features not part of the 1.0 specification.
>>
>> So let us try to avoid confusion regarding the semantic of virtio-ccw
>> revision 1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <>
>> ---
>> content.tex | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>> index c7ef7fd..86044dd 100644
>> --- a/content.tex
>> +++ b/content.tex
>> @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ The following values are supported:
>> \hline \hline
>> 0 & 0 & <empty> & legacy interface; transitional devices only \\
>> \hline
>> -1 & 0 & <empty> & Virtio 1.0 \\
>> +1 & 0 & <empty> & Virtio 1 \\
>> \hline
>> 2 & 0 & <empty> & CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS support \\
>> \hline
>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <>
Thanks!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
