[PATCH v2] conformance: clarify transitional/non-transitional

From
Michael S. Tsirkin
Date
2019-03-12T16:02:00+00:00
ID
Thread
[PATCH v2] conformance: clarify transitional/non-transitional
We already have a specification for conformance targets for non-transitional devices. Just add another clause that transitional devices satisfy.  VIRTIO-167  Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <> ---  conformance.tex
8 ++

------

1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)  diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex index 6df113b..8b69e39 100644 --- a/conformance.tex +++ b/conformance.tex @@ -341,13 +341,9 @@ A conformant implementation MUST be either transitional or  non-transitional, see
ef{intro:Legacy  Interface: Terminology}.
-A non-transitional implementation conforms to this specification -if it satisfies all of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements -defined above. - -An implementation MAY choose to implement OPTIONAL support for the +A transitional implementation MUST implement support for the  legacy interface, including support for legacy drivers -or devices, by additionally conforming to all of the MUST or +or devices, by conforming to all of the MUST or  REQUIRED level requirements for the legacy interface  for the transitional devices and drivers.

--
MST