Editorial comments on VIRTIO v1.2 csd01

From
Michael S. Tsirkin <>
Date
2022-05-10T13:08:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Editorial comments on VIRTIO v1.2 csd01
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:40:25PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 10:07:12 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <> wrote: >  >
> On Tue, May 10 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote: > >  > >
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:40:53PM -0400, Paul Knight wrote:
> > >> Hi all, > > >>  > > >> These comments are intended for the TC Editors, although I'm sending it to the > > >> TC's email list for future reference. > > >>  > > >> In running a link check, I noted several issues, none significant for this > > >> initial public review publication: > > >> - broken link in Normative references: > > >> -- [S390 Common I/O] ESA/390 Common I/O-Device and Self-Description, IBM > > >> Publication SA22-7204, > > >>  http://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dz9ar501/CCONTENTS , and any > > >> future revisions > > >> (This link is currently broken, and I could not find any alternative source for > > >> this document. - please rewrite the reference to indicate document is no longer > > >> available at this link. You may also consider whether the solitary citation at > > >> 4.3.1.3 is still needed.) > > >> This broken link is not a blocking issue for a Committee specification Draft, > > >> but it will not be allowed for a Committee Specification.
> > > > >
> OK I addressed the below but not the above. Cornelia, Halil, I could use > >
> some help here.
> >  >
> I think the content of this document is still generally relevant, but >
> I don't know where it (or an update) can be found nowadays... Halil, did >
> you have any luck locating a public link? > >  >
> Yes, a link to a publication in a BOOKMGR format.
>  https://www.ibm.com/resources/publications/OutputPubsDetails?PubID=SA22720401  >
> Unfortunately I failed at getting the corresponding people to provide
> something more usable (e.g. a PDF). >
> I believe, the best we can do is use this link. Maybe if more people
> start complaining about the format provided... >
> Regards,
> Halil  Should it still say SA22-7204 or should it say SA22-7204-01?

--
MST