I snippet rest of mail - wasn't sure whether you were waiting for an
answer.
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:45:26PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
> Again I don't know what to do with this. I feel if it's put up for vote in the current
>
> form it's likely to fail. I propose cutting out as much as possible as a first step, so
>
> we can make progress. Specifically the MSI-X commands are clearly PF specific
>
> so there's no concern about VF memory use at all. We can worry about other
>
> types of command down the road when it becomes relevant.
>
> Since feature bits proposes are limited to PF, I agree that current short cut is fine to place in 64-127 feature bits.
>
> When/if similar functionality is needed at scale for the VF or SIOV devices, placing them in 64-127 bits area weight way less for sake of "people familiarity to feature bits".
> Do you agree?
I think we can all agree that extensions for scalable IOV will need more
work if that is what you are saying.
--
MST
