On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 01:38:21PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
>
>
>
From: Michael S. Tsirkin <>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:32 AM
>
> >
> I am requesting to drop the commit point that limits the usage of the AQ.
> >
> Do you agree that AQ can be extended for use beyond VF and SIOV group
>
> management commands?
> >
> Or one should create a new VQ type?
> >
> If it is the later, I don't see the need of multiple AQ.
> >
>
> not management. that is old term and indeed too narrow.
>
> administration as in hypervisor (admin) access through PF while guest has
>
> access through VF.
> >
>
> legacy access you link to below seems to fall within scope:
>
> we access VF through a PF.
> >
>
> So what is the problem?
> >
> Commit log confused me. You clarified above.
> It is clear now. Hence no problem.
>
>
> maybe we'll change the meaning down the road. I do not see the immediate
>
> need currently though.
> >
> As long as we agree that it is open to widen the scope, it is acceptable.
>
> > > [1]
> >
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202304/msg00511.html
> >
>
> Then I don't see a problem. It's just commit log, not spec. Let it slide is my
>
> suggestion, this is spec text not code.
>
> Ok. I feel it is still worth to have commit log updated. If you happen to revise v13, please do.
> Else its fine.
>
> v12 surely doesn't merge cleanly. So v13 is needed anyway.
>
> Can you please generate? Patch-5 of v12 fails to apply.
should apply on top of 985bbf397db4228faf3ec464e838687dc4cb4904. master
will fail because of the file movement. I will need to rebase to apply
on latest master, I will do it before we start voting.
--
MST
